Junk Food Scoring System

A New Check Mark Aims To Indicate Healthier Packaged Food Choices. How Effective Is It?

October 30, 2008 at 1:44PM by Marion Nestle | comment

Big Food companies have gotten together and agreed on a scoring system to identify “better-for-you” packaged foods. Thanks to my colleague in Copenhagen, Morton Strunge Meyer, for sending the link to the qualifying criteria.

As is true of scoring systems in general, these are complicated and constitute a slippery slope. Take sodium, for example. The allowance is particularly generous (junk foods don’t taste good without it)--480 mg per serving. That means 479 mg qualifies and that’s still nearly half a gram.

Having one check mark instead of the various ones run by PepsiCo, Kraft, and Unilever seems useful if--and only if--the criteria are stringent (which this one is not for sodium), and this symbol replaces all of the others. Even so, this looks like preemption.

It’s voluntary and seems designed to head off a mandatory traffic light system (red, yellow, green) that would warn people away from the worst junk foods. It also preempts the FDA proposal to display the full number of calories per package. Alas, this is a standard food industry tactic: preempt with something that seems better than what is currently available to stave off something that could be worse.

comment

tags: what to eat, check mark, marion nestle, healthy choices, packaged foods

Comments

Marion Nestle

Noted author Marion Nestle is a Professor in the Department of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health at New York University. She is the author of What to Eat.
read full bio.

see all posts by this author