Monday, September 8
ADVERTISEMENT
NEWS

4.18.2008 8:30 AM

Bush Again Delays Polar Bear Decision

Icon of Global Warming Remains on Thin Ice

e-mail
print
rss
widget
Governement still debating placing polar bear on endangered list
Photo: John Pitcher / Istock

By Dan Shapley

The Fish and Wildlife Service has asked for court permission to delay its decision on whether or not to list the polar bear as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act until June 30.

That's according to environmental groups — Center for Biological Diversity, Greenpeace, and the Natural Resources Defense Council — which had petitioned the Bush Administration to list the polar bear as endangered way back in 2005. The Fish and Wildlife Service was supposed to have decided Jan. 9, and now has been sued to force a decision.

The decision is seen as one way to force the Bush Administration to reckon with global warming, since the melting of Arctic sea ice is a major threat to polar bears. By some estimates, two-thirds of the world's polar bears could be gone by 2050, primarily due to loss of ice, which makes it hard or impossible for them to migrate and find food.

Critics have pointed out that during the delay, oil and gas companies have been granted government rights to develop energy reserves in polar bear habitat, including areas that might well be protected if the species is listed as threatened. In February, Shell Oil placed a bid for rights to drill the Chukchi Sea, where an estimated one-tenth of America’s polar bears live, according to the Sierra Club. Oil and gas activities, including seismic testing, are due to begin in the Chukchi Sea this summer.

President Bush made a glancing comment on the issue in his speech on global warming this week, when he suggested that neither the Clean Air Act nor the Endangered Species Act nor any other existing legal framework is suited to the task of dealing with climate change.

When it comes to polar bears, it looks as though the Bush Administration has won a delay regardless of the success of environmental groups in court. The hearing on the issue is scheduled for May 8.

Here's what some of the environmental groups had to say:

“Polar bears need our help now, not whenever the Bush administration feels like getting around to it," Kassie Siegel, climate program director at the Center for Biological Diversity and lead author of the 2005 petition to list the polar bear under the Endangered Species Act. "The administration will do nothing to protect polar bears and nothing about global warming until ordered to do so by a federal judge. That’s why we’ve moved this case as quickly could possibly be done under the rules of court."

“The Endangered Species Act is absolutely unambiguous: the Fish and Wildlife Service was required to make a final decision months ago," said Andrew Wetzler, director of the NRDC Endangered Species Project. "The scientific evidence is as overwhelming and undeniable — polar bears are an endangered species that ought to be protected by the Endangered Species Act.”

“If the government truly were serious about protecting the polar bear, then the Fish and Wildlife Service would list it immediately under the U.S. Endangered Species Act and protect its Arctic habitat from further oil development,” said Melanie Duchin, global warming campaigner at Greenpeace USA.


e-mail
print
rss
widget

LOG-IN TO POST A COMMENT

You must be registered on thedailygreen.com to post comments. Please login using the form below or click here to join now.
username:
password:

POST A COMMENT

User:
Subject:
Comment:

 characters left

ADVERTISEMENT

The 10 Most Fuel Efficient 2008 Vehicles
10 Tips: Save 20% on Gas Everyday
9 Toxin-Free Baby Bottles
Calculate Your Impact
Search for a location:
Enter your city or zip code to get your local temperature and air quality and find local green food and recycling resources near you.

ADVERTISEMENT
Hearst Digital Media