Poll results can be notoriously misleading, depending on how the questions were formulated and who was asked, so it's good to view them with a strong sense of skepticism -- particularly when the organization sponsoring the poll has a dog in the fight.
Still, the results of the poll by the Clean Fuels Development Coalition that show, among other things, that Americans generally think well of ethanol, have some interesting results.
Ethanol, despite the poll results, has had a mixed debut in the American fuel supply. Besides rising food costs, the ethanol boom has fueled an increase in the size of the dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico, as nutrients from over-fertilized Midwest farm fields course down the Mississippi Valley, feeding excessive algae growth that sucks the oxygen from the water. More and more people are questioning the wisdom of investing in so much corn-based ethanol, but the presidential candidates have generally supported it -- in part, no doubt, to the importance of Iowa as a primary state.
Ethanol can be made from a variety of sources, and scientists are working on formulations that can use waste and grass crops, among other sources. So-called cellulosic ethanol, if it can be made cheaply, would offer benefits that corn-based ethanol does not: less pollution, the ability to grow it on marginal farmland, a better ratio of energy output per energy input. That could be the breakthrough that ethanol needs.
|
||||||||||||
![]() |
Enter your city or zip code to get your local temperature and air quality and find local green food and recycling resources near you.
|
![]() |
||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
Comments| Add a comment